Sunday 29 September 2013

London Underground - Harry Beck

Harry Beck


Henry Beck (1901-74)
London Underground map
1933
Lithograph on paper
Museum no. E.816-1979
Given by Ken Garland Esq
Henry Beck's London Underground map is the most famous transport map in the world, and an icon of 20th-century London. Beck was an unemployed engineer when he first devised the map. Prioritising the relationships between the lines and stations, rather than geographical accuracy, he used a method that recalls electrical circuit systems.


The striking Tube map that is recognised across the globe was the brainchild of Underground electrical draughtsman, Harry Beck, who produced this imaginative yet stunningly simple design back in 1933.
Beck based the map on the circuit diagrams he drew for his day job, stripping the sprawling Tube network down to basics.
The result was an instantly clear and comprehensible chart that would become an essential guide to London - and a template for transport maps the world over.
Beck's revolutionary design, with certain modifications and additions, survives to the present day and is set to serve London Underground and its millions of customers for many years to come.

Ken Garland on Harry Beck

The tube map almost never made it out of its creator’s notebook. The designer was Harry Beck, a young draughtsman who drew electrical circuits for the Underground. Beck’s biographer, Ken Garland, befriended him in the 1950s, and before the designer’s death in 1974 he uncovered the story behind the creation of what Beck called ‘the diagram’.

‘As a native of a small village in Devon and moving to London to study art, I found the metropolis impossible to navigate,’ Garland recalls. ‘I would get on the tube and see Harry’s diagram. London suddenly made sense, and so I asked people at the college if they knew who the designer was.’

Garland was told that HC Beck could be found at the London College of Printing, where he taught part-time, and he paid him a visit. They soon became friends.

Beck first drew his diagram in 1931 – a difficult time to be working for the newly established London Transport Passenger Board. With money tight, the board’s employees could be laid off at short notice. Beck, then 29, had been employed as a ‘temporary’ since he first started in 1925. While at work drawing an electrical circuit diagram, he had an idea: a new map that would raise the profile of the tube and attract much-needed new passengers, and that would make the system seem modern, quick, efficient – and, above all, easier to navigate.

At the time, the maps of the network showed individual lines run by different railway companies. It was geographically correct, but impossible to read. The lines snaked all over the place. The first map, published in 1908, betrayed the fact that different operators were competing with each other and could not agree where the Underground ended.

Harry laid out London’s Underground routes as he would a circuit board, and took it to the publicity department. He told Garland: ‘Looking at the old map of the railways, it occurred to me that it might be possible to tidy it up by straightening the lines, experimenting with diagonals and evening out the distances between stations.’

‘He was modest,’ recalls Garland. ‘He’d quietly taken the diagram to them and said: “You may be interested in this.” The publicity chiefs replied: “You can’t do it like this – the public will be really confused by the idea, no one will understand it.” ’

His idea was dismissed as ridiculous – people couldn’t understand why it wasn’t geographically accurate – and later he was laid off. Beck’s
dismissal made him suspicious of London Underground. He chose to sell the idea to them as a freelancer (for just ten guineas), giving him control over the future integrity of his design. But as work in his old office began to pick up, his former colleagues remembered him: they had appreciated his help in the tube workers’ orchestra and, in 1933, he was back on board and pitching his idea again.

Garland continues: ‘Beck would not take no for an answer. He went back with a revised copy, and finally they agreed to produce a small print run of 1,000 fold-out versions, put them in central London train stations and ask passengers for comments. One of the publicity team went to Piccadilly Circus and asked staff if anyone had been interested in the diagram. The maps had gone within an hour. Beck had been proved correct, and the publicity department arranged for a print run of 750,000.’

Harry Beck was good news for the tube. Passenger numbers had levelled off, and they needed a bright idea to sell the Underground. ‘Beck’s map was the catalyst,’ says Garland.

More than a million were in circulation within six months of being commissioned. Wall maps were next: Beck was paid a further five guineas to produce one. But for something that is so recognisable as a piece of ‘trademark’ art, Harry Beck was not, according to Garland, part of the modernist movement that was sweeping through the pysche of painters, sculptors, other designers and filmmakers of the period. ‘He was not influenced by contemporary art,’ says Garland. ‘He knew little or nothing about it.’

‘The diagram’, as Beck insisted it was called, was a lifelong obsession. As new routes were added, Beck would tinker with his design. He was constantly seeking to improve its clarity, and when the publicity department realised they had a hit on their hands, he had to fend off ‘helpful’ suggestions from tube bosses.

Beck added lines that were yet to be built: one route in a 1949 version has the Northern Line linking Finsbury Park on the Victoria and Piccadilly lines with Highgate. It gave Stroud Green and Crouch End their own stations, and Highgate became an interchange with a branch going to stations at Cranley Gardens, Muswell Hill and Alexandra Palace.

‘For the best part of 30 years, his home was turned over to the map,’ recalls Garland. ‘There were sketches all over the place. The front room would often have a massive copy spread out on the floor for Harry to pore over. His wife Nora would find, when making their bed, a pile of scribbled notes under the pillow that Harry had been working on in the middle of the night.’

But in 1959, after nearly three decades of working on the diagram, he was unceremoniously dumped from the project. Garland explains: ‘Harry went one morning to his local station and there on the wall was a diagram that was not done by him. It was devastating. To add to the insult, he thought it was a crude and ineffective version of his own diagram. It was signed by Harold F Hutchison, not a designer but head of the publicity department.’ According to Garland, Beck had become known in the publicity department for being ‘difficult’ when it came to the diagram, and there were moves to remove his stewardship.

Beck embarked on a letter-writing campaign to take back control of his life’s work. It was fruitless. London Underground accepted no argument that the current map was influenced by his work, or that it was an inferior design.

When Beck fell ill, his piles of sketches were destined for the dustbin, but Garland stepped in and saved them – recognising that they were crucial to understanding its development. Among the papers Garland saved was the first pencil sketch of the diagram, now at the V&A Museum.

The diagram’s iconic status should not be overlooked, says Garland. ‘It has touched so many people. The tube diagram is one of the greatest pieces of graphic design produced, instantly recognisable and copied across the world. His contribution to London cannot be easily measured, nor should it be underestimated.’ 

After Beck
By 1960, Beck had fallen out with the Underground's publicity officer, Harold Hutchison. Hutchison, though not a designer himself, drafted his own version of the Tube map that year. It removed the smoothed corners of Beck's design and created some highly cramped areas (most notably, around Liverpool Street station); in addition, lines were generally less straight.[8] However, Hutchison also introduced interchange symbols (circles for Underground-only, squares for connections with British Rail) that were black and allowed multiple lines through them, as opposed to Beck who used one circle for each line at an interchange, coloured according to the corresponding line.
In 1964, the design of the map was taken over by Paul Garbutt who, like Beck, had produced a map in his spare time due to his dislike of the Hutchison design. Garbutt's map restored curves and bends to the diagram, but retained Hutchison's black interchange circles (the squares however were replaced with circles with a dot inside). Garbutt continued to produce Underground maps for at least another twenty years — Tube maps stopped bearing the designer's name in 1986, by which time the elements of the map bore a very strong resemblance to today's map.[9] Today, the Tube map bears the legend, "This diagram is an evolution of the original design conceived in 1931 by Harry Beck" in the lower right-hand corner.
While the standard Tube map mostly avoided representing mainline rail services, a new variant of the map issued in 1973, the 'London's Railways' map, was the first to depict Tube and surface rail services in a diagrammatic style closely matched to Beck's designs. This version was created by Tim Demuth of the London Transport publicity office and was jointly sponsored by British Rail and London Transport. Demuth's map did not replace the standard Tube map but continued to be published as a supplementary resource, later known as the 'London Connections' map.[10]
Some alterations have been made to the map over the years. More recent designs have incorporated changes to the network, such as the Docklands Light Railway and theextension of the Jubilee line. It has also been expanded to include certain rail lines not part of the Underground network (see below), and to indicate which Tube stops connect with National Rail services, rail links to airports, and river boats. In some cases, stations within short walking distance are now shown, often with the distance between them (this is an evolution of the pedestrian route between Bank and Monument stations, which was once prominently marked on the map). Further, step-free access notations are also incorporated in the map.
In addition, since 2002 the fare zones have been added, to better help passengers judge the cost of a journey. Nevertheless the map remains true to Beck's original scheme, and many other transport systems use schematic maps to represent their services, likely inspired by Beck.
Despite there having been many versions over the years, somehow the perception of many users is that the current map actually is, more or less, Beck's original version from the 1930s — a testament to the effectiveness of his design. Beck did actually draw versions with other formats, 22½ degrees rather than 45 (the Paris Métro version uses 22½ degrees as a base); and an unused version for the 1948 Olympic Games.
One of the major changes to be made to the revision of the Tube map put out in September 2009 was the removal of the River Thames. Although historically the river was not present on several official maps (for example, according to David Leboff and Tim Demuth's book; in 1907, 1908, and 1919), from 1921 it was absent for several years (on pocket maps designed by MacDonald Gill). The Thames-free 2009 version was the first time that the river has not appeared on the Tube map since the Stringemore pocket map of 1926. This latest removal resulted in widespread international media attention,[11][12] and general disapproval from most Londoners as well as from mayor Boris Johnson.[13]Based on this reaction, the following edition of the diagram in December 2009 reinstated both the river and fare zones.


London Underground - Charles Yerkes

Charles Yerkes played a huge role in the construction and development of the London Underground.

In August 1900, Yerkes decided to become involved in the development of the London Underground railway system after riding along the route of one proposed line and surveying the City of London from the summit of Hampstead Heath. He established the Underground Electric Railways Company of London to take control of the Metropolitan District Railwayand the partly built Baker Street & Waterloo RailwayCharing Cross, Euston and Hampstead Railway; and Great Northern, Piccadilly and Brompton Railway. Yerkes employed complex financial arrangements similar to those that he had used in America to raise the funds necessary to construct the new lines and electrify the District railway. In one of his last great triumphs, Yerkes managed to thwart an attempt by J. P. Morgan to enter the London Underground field.
Source[Wikipedia]

Yerkes




  • Born in Philadelphia 
  • 1850's went to jail
  • 1870's went to Chicago
  • 1880's he built a transport system in Chicago, he made many enemies
  • Forced into semi retirement in New York
  • At this point he looked to London and assisting with the construction of the Underground
  • He bought Golders Green as it was cheap land to build on
  • Hired Leslie Green as his architect so that all of his tube stations looked alike
  • Yerkes died before any of his developments were built though they were in development
  • He died in New York in 1905, a victim of kidney disease

Saturday 28 September 2013

London Underground - Forgotten stations

There are over 40 disused tube stations on the London Underground. One specifically is Aldwych station, this was first known as Strand station. The name Strand confused many passengers as there was already a station called this, Charing Cross as it is now known. The station was then changed to Aldwych. The station was closed due to the lift systems not meeting modern health and safety standards. There are 2 platforms within Aldwych station; Platform A which is still in use by film companies, and Platform B which is lost and unused. It is said that the ghost of a young actress still roams the tunnels waiting for her 'last curtain call'. The foot tunnels in Aldwych station were last used in 1994 though some were closed in 1907 and some were never open to passengers.



Wednesday 25 September 2013

London Underground - The Typeface

The London Underground typeface was designed by Edward Johnston in 1916. Johnston sans has a few distinct characteristics:
  • Perfect circle within the O
  • Diagonal square used as the dot above the i and j (also used for punctuation)
A brief history:
  • First commissioned in 1913 and was completed in 1916 by Edward Johnston. 
  • It uses roman proportions with humanist warmth.
  • Johnston's student Eric Gill assisted with the development of the typeface
  • Eric Gill later went on to develop the ideas of the typeface and create Gill Sans
  • Due to the time when it was created it was circulated as a lettering guide for sign painters
  • It was also made into wood and metal blocks for posters, signs and other publicity material
  • Johnston only drew one weight for this typeface and felt very strongly about having it as one
  • One of his other students agreed to create the Bold capitals of the typeface, this angered Johnston to the level where he refused to speak to the student for a number of decades
  • The wood and metal blocks were used until the late 70's
  • In 1979 the London transport asked the design agency Bank and Miles to modernise the font
  • Eiichi Kono who was a new designer at the agency was asked to revise and revive the family
  • He redrew the proportions for better display and evened out some of the inconsistent details of the original but he also added 2 new weights and accompanying italics for the full set
  • Years later the design was expanded by monotype wit greater support for different languages. 
  • It is now know as New Johnston and is now exclusively used by Transport for London











London Underground - Global Metro Systems

Frankfurt:

Paris:

Beijing:



Friday 20 September 2013

London Underground - Olympic Legends Map


London Underground - Visual History

The history of the tube in pictures:


24 May 1862: 
Chancellor of the Exchequer, William Ewart Gladstone, and directors and engineers of the Metropolitan Railway Company, embark on an inspection tour of the world's first underground line. Built between Paddington and the City of London, it opened in January of the following year. Gladstone is seen in the front row, near right.

Picture: Hulton Archive/Getty Images


1863: 
A contemporary lithograph of a steam locomotive on the Metropolitan line near Paddington Station
Picture: Hulton Archive/Getty Images


An early Underground train is seen on the Central London Railway, opened in 1900, which eventually became the Central Line. This engine could be driven in both directions.
Picture: Topical Press Agency/Getty Images


Workmen break through a concrete wall during construction of the Central Line extension to Bank, circa 1912
Picture: Hulton Archive/Getty Images


1926: 
An underground train is transported on wheels through the streets of London
Picture: Fox Photos/Getty Images


1930:
London Underground workers building the Piccadilly Line extension are seen at Turnpike Lane
Picture: Fox Photos/Getty Images


A London Underground workers' canteen, circa 1935
Picture: Topical Press Agency/Getty Images


1939: 
Evacuees at a London Underground station begin the journey to their new homes
Picture: Fox Photos/Getty Images


8 March 1939:
Some of the four million tickets collected from London Underground passengers are examined in a survey by London Transport to discover the most and least used routes to help future infrastructure development
Picture: Gerry Cranham/Fox Photos/Getty Images



1940: 
People bed down for the night in an air raid shelter on a platform at Piccadilly Circus
Picture: Rex Features


1940: 
Members of the public are entertained by an ENSA concert party in Aldwych Underground Station
Picture: Fox Photos/Getty Images


1940: 
An air raid warden checks on children sleeping on hammocks strung between the train tracks in a London Underground station during the Blitz
Picture: Rex Features


12 January 1941: 
Soldiers help to clear the debris of Bank Underground Station, the morning after it received a direct hit during the Blitz. Some 111 people were killed in the bombing raid by German aircraft.
Picture: H F Davis/Getty Images


August 1943:
Women war workers enter and leave an underground aircraft parts factory, which occupies an incompleted section of the London Underground network 60 feet below street level
Picture: Keystone/Hulton Archive/Getty Images


1945: 
Soldiers return from Europe after D-Day, on a London Underground train
Picture: Keystone/Getty Images


1952: 
Harry Weatheley, responsible for keeping the ventilator shafts clean, surfaces from a vent at Piccadilly Circus underground station
Picture: Topical Press Agency/Getty Images


12 August 1957: 
Sir John Elliott, Chairman of the LTE, shakes hands with the driver of the new prototype 'silver' tube train at Northfields station on the Piccadilly Line
Picture: Harry Todd/Fox Photos/Getty Images



Design

Throughout the years that the underground has been in service there have been many changes with the design.
Poster available for passengers to buy. Celebrating 150 years of service.




Article from the Drum





Wednesday 18 September 2013

London Underground - Advertising


Advertising has played a massive part in the tube and with the recent 150 year anniversary there is a campaign in order which is celebrating the advertising underground.

The placement of advertising on the tube is very clever, every spare bit of space has been utilised. An example of this would be the large advertising spaces above the tracks, opposite the platform; these adverts are placed here to ensure that passengers will look at them, whether on the platform or on the train as it is in the station. 

Examples:

Coca Cola at Bond Street

Londonist at Bond Street

London Fashion Week at Holborn station

In addition to these typical print ads there are now moving image advertisements on the walls of the tube tunnel, this is in an effort to catch the passengers attention with a moving image where they might not expect to see one. 


Advertising on the trains: 
Another way to ensure that the adverts are seen by people, they are placed in the train next to the map of the line, advertisers know that these maps are looked at by almost every passenger, meaning that they will see their ads.




Advertising:





Utilising every free space:



Advertising based on nearest tourist attraction:

V&A Gallery

West End Theatres


Tuesday 17 September 2013

London Underground : The First Tube Map

The Map:

1908
The first map was designed in 1908 by the Underground Electric Railways Company of London (UERL) as well as four other underground railway companies using the Underground brand as part of a common advertising initiative. The map showed eight lines - four of which operated by the UERL and one from each of the other four companies
  • Bakerloo: brown
  • Hampstead: grey
  • Piccadilly: yellow
  • Metropolitan District Railway: green
The other lines:
  • Central London Railway: blue
  • City and South London Railway: black
  • Great Northern and City Railway: orange
  • Metropolitan Railway: red




Monday 16 September 2013

London Underground - Information Graphics

The London Underground map is one of my all time favourite pieces of design. The simplistic coloured lines and accurate map of the city make it easy to navigate and a very nice thing to look at. I have been to London many times and have found it very easy to get around using the map of the tube. 

As the most recent olympic games were hosted in London, the tube map was put to the test by millions of visitors who were all trying to get to the same target. The tube was extremely busy but there were very few incidents and the transition went very smoothly. 

Record numbers carried on London transport during Olympics:

During the Games the Tube, Docklands Light Railway and London Overground carried more people than at any other time in their respective histories.
  • More than 60million journeys were made on the Tube - up 30 per cent on normal levels, the DLR saw more than six million journeys - up by over 100 per cent on normal levels, and London Overground saw nearly six million journeys - up by 47 per cent on normal levels
  • On Monday the A4, M4 and roads around Heathrow Airport and the Olympic Park will be busy today as athletes, officials and media leave London
  • Drivers are advised to avoid driving into central London, on or around the Olympic Route Network wherever possible
  • The Piccadilly line will be busier than usual throughout the day as people travel to Heathrow Airport
The London 2012 Olympic Games has seen inspirational sporting moments, the city turned into a massive sporting and cultural venue, and record numbers using the transport network as visitors and Londoners have made the most of the vast array of attractions on offer.
Tomorrow, Monday 13 August, will see one of Heathrow Airport's busiest days as athletes, coaching staff, representatives, international media and officials head home. This will mean that certain roads and Tube stations will be busy and passengers and road users are encouraged to avoid the affected areas.

Saturday 14 September 2013

London Underground -The History


London Underground was formed in 1985, but its history dates back to 1863 when the world's first underground railway opened.
Today, London Underground is a major business with three million passenger journeys made every day, serving 275 stations and over 408 km of railway.

Past and future

London has changed a lot since the first stretch of line - the Metropolitan, or Met - opened on 9 January 1863. The first stretch measured six kilometres (nearly four miles) and ran between Paddington (Bishop's Road) and Farringdon Street.

Cut and cover

To build the Met, streets along the route were dug up, tracks laid in a trench, covered with a brick-lined tunnel and the road surface replaced. Known as the 'cut and cover' method, this was quick and effective, but created as many problems as it was designed to solve. It caused congestion during construction and it was abandoned towards the end of the 19th century. By then, however, the Metropolitan was a success, stretching ever further across Middlesex, through Hertfordshire and into Buckinghamshire.
Other companies were keen to get involved and by Christmas 1868, the Metropolitan District had opened a line between Westminster and South Kensington.
This linked to a branch line from the original Met and some eastward extensions. These railways completed today's Circle line by 1884.
Once the system had started there was no stopping it and the search was on for further opportunities.

The Thames Tunnel

Twenty years before the Met steamed into history, Sir Marc Brunel - and his famous son Isambard - had built the Thames Tunnel between Rotherhithe and Wapping.
This was the first underwater tunnel in the world. The method used was similar to coal mining. Engineers sank vertical shafts and excavated the tunnels from within a metal shield. It is a tribute to the Brunels that major refurbishment to the tunnel was only needed during the 1990s.
Originally designed for horse-drawn traffic, it opened in 1843 for pedestrians, became a railway tunnel in 1869 and now carries the East London line.

Tunnel vision

The Brunel Engine House Museum, behind Rotherhithe tube station, tells the story of this unusual tunnel: one time banquet hall, shopping centre, and fairground.
In 1870 another sub-Thames railway opened. This had a cable-hauled line between the Tower of London and Bermondsey.
In marked contrast to the Thames Tunnel, this failed as an Underground line and was converted for pedestrian use after just a few months. It closed for good when Tower Bridge station opened in 1894.



Should Peter Jackson have directed the Hobbit series?


Many speculations have been made about whether Peter Jackson should have returned to direct the Hobbit series. Many fans wanted to see what a new director could have brought to the film. 

What most people will not know is that Peter was not asked to direct the Hobbit, Guillermo Del Torro was given the role of director. Peter was not completely detached from the franchise though, he and his wife Fran were asked to write the script for the 2 films (at the time).

Months of pre-production were completed and the project was delayed significantly. With fans angry at the delay and writing not being completed Del Torro made the decision to step down as director of the films but would have some input into what made it to screen. 

Del Torro's quote:

"In light of ongoing delays in the setting of a start date for filming 'The Hobbit,' I am faced with the hardest decision of my life,”Del Toro wrote on the "Lord of the Rings" site TheOneRing.net. “After nearly two years of living, breathing and designing a world as rich as Tolkien’s Middle Earth, I must, with great regret, take leave from helming these wonderful pictures. [...] Both as a co-writer and as a director, I wish the production nothing but the very best of luck and I will be first in line to see the finished product. I remain an ally to it and its makers, present and future, and fully support a smooth transition to a new director.”



Were there actually some kind of card a person could carry to identify themselves as a nerd, mine would be laminated. On my night stand you'll currently find a copy of Carl Sagan's Pale Blue Dot and a hardback of Neal Stephenson's Anathem. On my DVD shelves you'll find far more sci-fi and horror movies than anything else. My hard drives are packed to capacity with games. I go to LAN parties. The only posters hanging in my home office are Tyler Stout prints for The Monster Squad and Inglorious Basterds and a poster my wife made for a movie I tried/failed to make when I was teenager. I actually regret that I've never played Dungeons & Dragons. Regret!

Point is, if anyone is supposed to be excited about the prospect of Peter Jackson directing The Hobbit and its untitled sequel, it's someone like me. But I'm not. In fact, I kind of hope that the deal never gets off of the negotiating table it is currently sitting on.


That's because I think each entry in a film franchise should be handled by a different filmmaker. Jackson's Lord of the Rings trilogy is an exception because all three films were conceived out of one unified vision from the beginning. They were produced in tandem with one another and the final yield feels more like a nine-hour-long film that was divided into three parts for marketing convenience. Sure, I have no doubt that Jackson could deliver two more films with the same level of consistent quality that spans LotR, but that's a boring, safe bet. I'd rather see him move onto new projects that he actually wants to direct, not stay on projects he tried to hire other people to direct.


Almost all film franchises suffer from having one director stay on for more than two films. I suspect it has something to do with a director's clout on a film increasing hand-in-hand with their staying power on the franchise. Even if they don't receive an actual producing credit, they might as well have, because each subsequent film feels like their previous film has just gobbled itself and doubled in size. Look at the Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy. On the first film, Gore Verbinski had something to prove. He wanted to take something as basic as a ride at a theme park and turn it into a robust action-adventure blockbuster. And he did just that. Then Dead Man's Chest came along and he had to turn all of the action and spectacle of the film up to 11. The result was a bit of a bloated runtime, but the overall film was pretty solid. But the third film, At World's End? It's like Verbinski was John Doe from Se7en and Pirates of the Caribbean was the fat man and he kept feeding the engorged behemoth more and more of its own self until it died from the lack of nutrition.


I fear the same thing is happening to Harry Potter, too. For me the most rewarding film in that series is Alfonso Curaon's Prisoner of Azkaban. There's such a wild, appreciable shift in style on display there that it really was the point for me that defined the Potter franchise as something very special. The producers had realized that hiring Christopher Columbus to make all of the films would dig the franchise into a place of unambitious comfort, so they brought in fresh blood for parts three, four and five. Then they got comfortable. They hired back five's David Yates for part six as well. And then they brought him back twice more for the final two films, giving him a stylistic monopoly on four of the eight films.

Sure, the trailer for Yates' Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is well cut and the movies look like they're going to send the franchise out on one hell of a high note, but the trailers for Order of the Phoenix and Half Blood Prince were each fantastic as well. The films, however, both confused the story's core elements of conflicted friendships for emo brooding and ended up excising the most thrilling moments from their respective books. They're not bad films; they just don't inspire the franchise to new heights the way a new director would. Splitting Deathly Hallows into two parts certainly allows for considerably more breathing room, which should mean that nothing important from the books will end up on the cutting room floor, but I'm still only cautiously excited for the films due entirely to Yates' continued involvement.


There's just something great about the wildcard, about a director coming into a proven blockbuster franchise and having to stay on their toes as "the new guy." Even if they don't deliver the best entry of their series, they almost always deliver a unique product. After Guillermo del Toro officially left The Hobbit, the first name to be rumored for the director's chair was District 9's Neill Blomkamp. There's nothing about his work to date that would make me think he's a good pick for elves and dwarves and wizards, but that's why the prospect of the rumor was so enticing. I didn't actually want Blomkamp to direct simply because I'd want someone who has only worked on his own original scripts to keep working on his own original scripts, but had the papers been signed I would have been incredibly excited to see what a Blomkamp Hobbit would look like.


I know exactly what a Peter Jackson Hobbit would look like. And that's the problem. I don't want to see five films all telling relatively the same story from the same filmmaker. I want fresh blood for The Hobbit. I don't want a director who is so far into his comfort zone that he becomes blind to mistakes he's making. I don't want another Spider-Man 3, Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End, Back to the Future III, or Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. My nerdiness cannot abide another disappointment on that scale.


Peter Hall suggests that a new director would have been better for the franchise and that when Del Toro stepped down New Line should have sought another director rather than settling with Jackson. 

Why Peter Hall thinks Jackson was the wrong choice:
  • Predictable styling
  • Expectations were too high
  • Fresh directing eyes would have improved the film
  • Too much comparison to The Lord of the Rings

Hall makes reference to other franchises which have used different directors for each of their sequels, an example of this would be the Twilight Saga. Each film has had a different director which has allowed each film to stand on it's own as well as being part of a saga.